Lucas
Versantvoort / November 6, 2014
“Don’t tell
them what you have seen,” is what director Henri-Georges Clouzot put at the beginning of his
film Diabolique, basically telling
you not to spoil the film to your friends. It’s precisely this statement that
sums up the entire film. Like many thrillers that succeeded it (The Usual Suspects springs to mind), this
film is all about the ending and everything that precedes it is mere foreplay.
“Don’t be
devils! Don’t ruin
the interest your friends could take
in this film. Don’t
tell them
what you have seen.
On their behalf, thank you.”
|
The action takes place in a boarding
school. The headmaster is a bit of an a-hole and so his wife, Christina, and his
mistress, Nicole, conspire to kill him. Pretty basic setup, right? The mistress
comes up with a plan which they execute to perfection. The wife lures him to Nicole’s
apartment a few hundred kilometers away from the school. There, Nicole sedates
him and they drown him in a bathtub. They then transport his body back to the
school and dump it in the school pool. They’re confident that when the body
floats to the surface, people will think it was an accident of some sort. Well,
that was easy, right? Except the body doesn’t surface and when the pool is
eventually drained, there is no body to be found. Even worse, several of the
school’s kids claim to have seen the headmaster. This launches a series of
events where Nicole and Christina try to get to the bottom of this whole
mystery.
As I said in the beginning, this
film is all about its climactic plot twist. Everything is but the journey
towards it. The journey is at its best when presenting you with strange
mysteries, like the blurry school photo where the presumed dead headmaster may
or not be in. (This may be the scene where Antonioni got his inspiration for a
similar scene in 1966’s Blow-Up.) But
in many scenes, the film tends to drag which is only worsened by the film’s
2-hour length. Another thing that only serves to bore is VĂ©ra Clouzot’s
(Christina’s) acting. As the name suggests, she was married to director Clouzot, so that will obviously have played a role in her being cast as
Christina, though that was definitely not to the film’s benefit. I get she’s
supposed to play the hysteric, insecure, but I can only handle so much
wide-eyed overacting before my interest dials down. All this made me feel like
I was watching a thriller that used to be considered cutting-edge, but was now
definitely showing its age…
…and then came the climactic plot twist. If
you’re even reading this review, chances are you must have already seen the
film, so consider this the spoiler-ridden paragraph where I explain everything.
Read at your own peril. One night at the school, Christina believes she hears
someone. She runs to the bathroom, only to find the headmaster lying inside the
water filled bathtub. He stands up with limp hands and pops out his fake eyes.
Christina, in shock, dies of heart attack. The headmaster looks upon her body
as Nicole(!) walks in and embraces the headmaster. So he and Nicole had already
thought out this whole ordeal from the start with the planned end result being
Christina’s death. I was genuinely surprised by the ending and I instantly took
to liking the film. There’s nothing worse than watching what you’ve been told
is a classic, only to find you genuinely don’t like it. That seemed to be the
case here, but the ending rights every wrong. I didn’t see it coming at all and
was kind of shocked by how hardcore it is from an emotional and psychological
standpoint: to stage such an elaborate trap for your wife so she can die of a
heart attack so you can be with your mistress. That’s pretty darn brutal. I
also like how the ending of a film from the fifties holds up even today in a
time when theaters are being bombarded with torture porn. There’s something
satisfying about that. With all these cheap attempts to shock audiences
nowadays (many of them failing to do so), the now sixty-year-old Diabolique – also designed to shock – still
holds up.
No comments:
Post a Comment