Lucas
Versantvoort / September 9, 2013
Whenever a
director breaks through with only his first feature film, expectations run high
on whatever he’ll do next. Neil Blomkamp did just that in 2009 with District
9, a film much liked at the time (not by me though).
That was a sci-fi film based on the
following premise: what would happen if the aliens finally landed? Instead of
it being utopian (see Close Encounters) or terrifying (see countless
horror films), it reverses everything with the aliens being forced to live in
South-African slums. The premise was interesting and it had some interesting
ideas, but the last half hour betrayed the rest of the film. Elysium
doesn’t suffer from the same problem, which doesn’t make it the better film, but
it does make it the more consistent one.
We get an obligatory flashback where
two kids dream of going to the Eden that is the space-station called Elysium, a
place where the rich live in peace and have access to instance-cures for every
possible ailment, whether internal or external. Max and Frey dream of going
there and Max, of course, promises that he’ll take them there someday. Years
later, they’re both grown up with Frey (Alice Braga) working as a nurse and Max
(Matt Damon) working in a factory, although he also has a history of stealing
cars. He becomes exposed to radiation in the factory and is told he only has a
few days to live. Realizing the medical bays in Elysium could save his life, he
seeks out a criminal ‘friend’ who tells him he can get him to Elysium with a
fake ‘passport’ if Max does a job for him. Of course, this is no ordinary job,
leading to events which pits him against Delacourt (Jodie Foster), Elysium’s
Secretary of Defense, and mad ex-Elysium agent Kruger (Sharlto Copley). Despite
doing it out of self-interest, he eventually becomes the only hope for mankind
on earth.
The first thing that springs to mind
when thinking about this film is ‘missed opportunities’. There’s a scene where
it seems like a conflict will arise between Max’s own desire and the fate of
mankind ( ‘the-needs-of-the-many-outweigh-the-needs-of-the-few’). This
immediately sounds promising. You start thinking ‘maybe he will have to choose
between his own well-being and the health of mankind on Earth’. Unfortunately, this
is ultimately avoided. Another missed opportunity is the lack of a clearly
explained world. We are dropped in a typical dystopian, cyberpunk-ish world
where the rich are rich, young and healthy, living comfortably on Elysium and
the poor struggle on a desolated Earth. This premise is in itself not the
problem. The problem is the lack of ‘history’. How did we get here? Another
question in the same category: if there are so many med-bays on Elysium, why
not manufacture more and place them on Earth so the rest of the people can
benefit from them? The fact that the world created in Elysium is
underwritten definitely lets this film down, especially during the climax where
I was supposed to feel elated, but instead didn’t feel much of anything.
Speaking of underwritten, Jodie
Foster’s character also fits that description. It’s always awkward when famous
actors are used for parts that eventually do little more than belittle their
filmography. Foster’s Delacourt is (up to a point) the film’s antagonist, but remains
a boring, ‘the-end-justifies-the-means’ kind of villain.
The music, while functional, firmly
resides in Cliché Valley. If it doesn’t smash your eardrums, Hans Zimmer style,
then it tries to appeal to your emotions with those overdone exotic, female
laments. Underwritten….literally.
It may sound like I’m bashing the
film (I am), but it’s not really a bad film. It checks the basic amount of
boxes for a film to be ‘decent’: we do want Max to succeed (which has more to
do with Matt Damon’s acting, I think), we want both him and Frey to survive
their predicaments, we want Kruger to die, etc. But in the end, I expected way
more of a sci-fi film of this caliber. It’s the lack of interesting and
well-explored sci-fi themes that disappoints me the most. I’m aware I’m judging
the film by what it lacks and not by what it does have, but
that’s what happens with sci-fi films.
I realized beforehand that
Blomkamp’s main problem would be to balance his sci-fi ideas and themes with
the obligatory action, necessary for mainstream appeal. He has both succeeded
and failed. He has succeeded in the sense that Elysium is the more
balanced, consistent film when compared to District 9. It doesn’t suffer
from a too noticeable shift in tone (like District 9’s last half hour).
On the other hand he has failed in the sense that the film is only more
consistent in its use of straightforward action, depriving the film—and
subsequently its audience—of well-explored sci-fi themes and concepts and thus
a more interesting, daring sci-fi experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment