Lucas
Versantvoort / 21 September 2014
Ordinary People is a film arguably most remembered for the fact it “stole”
the Oscars for Best Picture and Director from Scorsese’s Raging Bull which is now considered the more impressive and influential
film. Open any ‘Times The Oscars Got it Wrong’ list and the chances of Ordinary People being mentioned are as
high as the chance that the next Michael Bay flick will spend 90% of its budget
on special effects, 9% on the actors’ salaries and the remaining 1% on the
script…but now I’m just being silly. Ordinary
People, in all honesty, is far from the terrible film people perceive it to
be because it ‘stole the Oscar from Raging
Bull.’ I have come across descriptions along the lines of ‘a tv film that
got lucky,’ etc. The question of which film should have won the Oscar is
irrelevant when judging the film itself. The fact is that film buffs all over
the world have used the Oscar’s stupidity to avert their eyes from the things Ordinary People actually does well and
those are plenty.
Ordinary
People, unsurprisingly, is about ordinary people…more or less. It fits into
the tradition of films that are interested in exploring how Happy Suburban Life
of the ‘50s is merely an illusion. On the surface, the Jarrett family –
consisting of Calvin (Donald Sutherland), Beth (Mary Tyler Moore) and their son
Conrad (Timothy Hutton) – appears to be a typical happy family. Beneath it all
however, Conrad is suffering from PTSD and survivors guilt due to losing his
brother Buck in a sailing accident, Beth is obsessed with keeping up
appearances and denies her own feelings on losing Buck, and Calvin attempts to
get closer to both Conrad and his emotionally distant wife.
It’s easy to pigeonhole Beth as the ‘villain,’ but the
film shows such psychological insight that it allows us to empathize with her,
to understand her despite her acting like a bitch toward Conrad on a pretty
regular basis. We know she’s suppressing her own emotions, we know Conrad
probably reminds her of Buck and she can’t handle it. Moore’s performance only
enhances this feeling of empathy. Moore had pretty much become America’s
Sweetheart through shows like The Mary Tyler
Moore Show, but showed a lot of guts here in breaking free of that mold and
showing she could play a challenging, emotionally complex character.
As with the character of Beth, the
rest of the characters (most notably, of course, Calvin and Conrad) are treated
with the same amount of respect by director Robert Redford and the screenplay.
Though I’ve never been much of a Sutherland fan, he plays this part pretty darn
well, displaying the awkwardness of wanting to improve the relationship with
his son while also being forced to reevaluate his marriage to Beth. Timothy
Hutton would never land a role on this level again, proving that Oscars don’t
singlehandedly launch careers into stardom. Like Moore, Judd Hirsch breaks his Taxi persona and plays Conrad’s very
likeable therapist in an all too rare display of film therapy done well. While
the subject matter (PTSD, denial, the illusion of a happy life, etc.) well-trodden territory, it’s the execution and director Redford’s empathy for the
characters that makes Ordinary People
a fulfilling experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment